<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Response to Robert Cottrell&#8217;s &#8220;The Future of Futurology&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://fringehog.com/2007/11/29/response-to-robert-cottrells-the-future-of-futurology/</link>
	<description>Ideas on the Verge</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: pharmacy are tramadol order</title>
		<link>http://fringehog.com/2007/11/29/response-to-robert-cottrells-the-future-of-futurology/#comment-17952</link>
		<dc:creator>pharmacy are tramadol order</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fringehog.com/2007/11/29/response-to-robert-cottrells-the-future-of-futurology/#comment-17952</guid>
		<description>online order tramadol pharmacy &lt;a href="http://tramadol-order-pharmacy.gaia.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;pharmacy order men tramadol&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>online order tramadol pharmacy <a href="http://tramadol-order-pharmacy.gaia.com" rel="nofollow">pharmacy order men tramadol</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St. Paul&#8217;s Reach &#187; Follow up - More on the &#8216;Future of Futurology&#8217; &#38; Nokia&#8217;s digital behaviors and emerging entertainment trends</title>
		<link>http://fringehog.com/2007/11/29/response-to-robert-cottrells-the-future-of-futurology/#comment-7682</link>
		<dc:creator>St. Paul&#8217;s Reach &#187; Follow up - More on the &#8216;Future of Futurology&#8217; &#38; Nokia&#8217;s digital behaviors and emerging entertainment trends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fringehog.com/2007/11/29/response-to-robert-cottrells-the-future-of-futurology/#comment-7682</guid>
		<description>[...] only one. Fringehog - a &#8220;media project exploring how ideas about the future emerge&#8221; - published their own response which goes further in railing against lazy, poorly considered &#8216;end-of-year&#8217; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] only one. Fringehog - a &#8220;media project exploring how ideas about the future emerge&#8221; - published their own response which goes further in railing against lazy, poorly considered &#8216;end-of-year&#8217; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Oberg</title>
		<link>http://fringehog.com/2007/11/29/response-to-robert-cottrells-the-future-of-futurology/#comment-6755</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Oberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fringehog.com/2007/11/29/response-to-robert-cottrells-the-future-of-futurology/#comment-6755</guid>
		<description>Better written and researched than Cottrell's article. Thanks for a great reply.
Amy Oberg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better written and researched than Cottrell&#8217;s article. Thanks for a great reply.<br />
Amy Oberg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The (Wayward) Journey of Journalism &#171; Forward!</title>
		<link>http://fringehog.com/2007/11/29/response-to-robert-cottrells-the-future-of-futurology/#comment-6586</link>
		<dc:creator>The (Wayward) Journey of Journalism &#171; Forward!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fringehog.com/2007/11/29/response-to-robert-cottrells-the-future-of-futurology/#comment-6586</guid>
		<description>[...] pass up the chance to direct you to two great responses to this article by two wonderful Futurists, Michele Bowman and Jamais [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] pass up the chance to direct you to two great responses to this article by two wonderful Futurists, Michele Bowman and Jamais [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Peck</title>
		<link>http://fringehog.com/2007/11/29/response-to-robert-cottrells-the-future-of-futurology/#comment-6585</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Peck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fringehog.com/2007/11/29/response-to-robert-cottrells-the-future-of-futurology/#comment-6585</guid>
		<description>A few quotes, which I may make a hash of, seem relevant:

Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference. (Twain)

and:

First they ignore you.  Then they ridicule you.  Then they fight you.  Then you win. (Gandhi)

and:

While we cannot predict the future, with understanding man can, to a considerable degree, influence the course of coming events in his favor.
(Salk)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few quotes, which I may make a hash of, seem relevant:</p>
<p>Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference. (Twain)</p>
<p>and:</p>
<p>First they ignore you.  Then they ridicule you.  Then they fight you.  Then you win. (Gandhi)</p>
<p>and:</p>
<p>While we cannot predict the future, with understanding man can, to a considerable degree, influence the course of coming events in his favor.<br />
(Salk)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
